<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obvious, but interesting nonetheless</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nathanrtaylor.com/obvious-but-interesting-nonetheless/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nathanrtaylor.com/obvious-but-interesting-nonetheless/</link>
	<description>"Eventually, all things merge into one, and a river runs through it."</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 10:48:35 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.nathanrtaylor.com/obvious-but-interesting-nonetheless/comment-page-1/#comment-419</link>
		<dc:creator>John Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 19:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nathanrtaylor.com/?p=593#comment-419</guid>
		<description>John likes.

That&#039;s why I try to do both (like you are obviously doing) to work both systems. There is definitely more efficiency at lower cadences which is great for shorter events. But on longer events muscle fatigue sets in. So it&#039;s good to be able to draw on that aerobic system at higher power levels. I have trouble finding the correct balance sometimes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John likes.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s why I try to do both (like you are obviously doing) to work both systems. There is definitely more efficiency at lower cadences which is great for shorter events. But on longer events muscle fatigue sets in. So it&#8217;s good to be able to draw on that aerobic system at higher power levels. I have trouble finding the correct balance sometimes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
